Ainsworth, M., Blehar, M., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Boroditsky, L. (2011). How language shapes thought. Scientific American, 304, 62–65.
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Cooper, J. M. (1993). Rhetoric, dialectic, and the passions. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 11, 175–198.
Garber, B. D. (2004). Parental alienation in light of attachment theory: Consideration of the broader implications for child development, clinical practice and forensic process. Journal of Child Custody, 1(4), 49–76.
Garber, B. D. (2009). Attachment methodology in custody evaluation: Four hurdles standing between developmental theory and forensic application. Journal of Child Custody, 6(1/2), 38–61.
Garber, B. D. (2012). Security by association? Mapping attachment theory onto family law practice. Family Court Review, 50 (3), 467–470.
Garber, B. D. (2016). Exploring a process-oriented forensic family observation protocol. Family Court Review, 54(2), 261–276.
Garber, B. D., & Simon, R. A. (2018). Individual adult psychometric testing and child custody evaluations: If the shoe doesn’t fit, don’t wear it. Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, 30(2), 325–341.
Garber, B. D. (2020). Sherlock Holmes and the Case of Resist/Refuse Dynamics: Confirmatory Bias and Abductive Inference in Child Custody Evaluations. Family Court Review, 58(2), 386–402.
Main, M., Hesse, E., & Hesse, S. (2011). Attachment theory and research: Overview with suggested applications to child custody. Family Court Review, 49, 426–463.
Milchman, M. S., Geffner, R., & Meier, J. S. (2020). Ideology and Rhetoric Replace Science and Reason in Some Parental Alienation Literature and Advocacy: A Critique. Family Court Review, 58(2), 340–361.
No author. R. V. Mohan, [(1994)] 2 S.C.R. 9, (Supreme Court of Canada).
No author. Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923).
No author. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 589 (1993).
Rappaport, S., Gould, J., & Dale, M. (2018). Psychological testing can be of significant value in child custody evaluations: Don’t buy the ‘anti-testing, anti-individual, pro-family systems’ woozle. Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, 30(2), 405–436.
Sroufe, L. A., Egeland, B., Carlson, E. A., & Collins, W. (2005). The development of the person. The Minnesota study of risk and adaptation from birth to adulthood. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Dr. Ben Garber, Ph.D., is a New Hampshire licensed psychologist, parenting coordinator, former guardian ad litem, and expert consultant to family law matters across the United States and Canada. Dr. Garber is a prolific writer and
acclaimed speaker. He is the author of eight books concerned with better understanding and serving the needs of children, more than a two dozen juried professional publications concerned with high conflict family dynamics, and hundreds of popular press articles. Dr. Garber’s latest book, “Mending Fences: A collaborative, cognitive-behavioral “reunification” protocol serving the best interests of the post-divorce, polarized child” is available this Spring.

Leave a Reply, All comments will be moderated - Many thanks for your contribution

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

<span>%d</span> bloggers like this: