FAQ about Pathogenic Parenting

FAQ about Pathogenic Parenting

False Claim: Pathogenic Parenting Requires Empirical Evidence.
The truth: “It has substantial empirical support in the established literature of professional psychology.”  See the April 2016 Flying Monkey Newsletter. Pathogenic parenting is based on approximately 60 references to the standard literature of professional psychology.
False Claim: “The child has such a strongly bonded relationship with the allied narcissistic/borderline parent that separating the child from this parent would be psychologically harmful to the child”.
The truth: “it is necessary for health psychological development of the child …  Pathogenic Parenting is a child protection issue, not a custody issue”. The correct diagnosis is V995.51, Child Psychological Abuse. See the March 2016 issue of the Flying Monkey Newsletter
False Claim: “Pathogenic Parenting Must Be Peer Reviewed first”.
The Truth:
a. As Dr. Childress describes in his blog,  “Peer review of journal articles is applicable to  research studies, not  diagnostic formulations.  Diagnosis  involves the application of standard and  accepted  psychological principles and  constructs,  that are  already fully  established through research, to a  particular symptom set and pathology. An attachment-based model for the pathology traditionally called “parental  alienation” (an attachment-related pathology), is not a new theory within mental health, it is the application of  standard and established psychological constructs to the  symptoms displayed by  the child.  This is called diagnosis. Furthermore, full  clinical formulations regarding pathology are not submitted for peer-reviewed journal publication because clinical formulations of pathology are typically too extensive to be captured in a 10-page journal article. Kohut presented object-relations formulations of clinical pathology in a book.  Minuchin presented family systems formulations of pathology in a book. Kernberg described personality disorder pathology in a book. Clinical theoretical formulations are presented in books, not journal articles, and books are not peer-reviewed.  The “peer-review” of clinical formulations of pathology occurs when the book is read by mental health professionals. ”
b.) See  also see Dr. Childress’ other blog article entitled “peer review” , where it is necessary to scroll down to the bottom. AB-PA is a diagnostic, conceptual, diagnostic formulation.
c.) In the blog article, The Gardnerian Challenge, Dr. Childress writes that he has done his job in laying out a formulation, and it is incumbent upon a critic to disagree with something or propose an alternate formulation. No one has provided an alternate formulation.
d.) See also that a journal article is coming.
False Claim: Shouldn’t we listen to the children?
The truth: Yes, let’s listen to these children.

False Claim: Parental Alienation is just a cover up for Batterers.
The truth: Child psychological abuse and DV both exist, both are bad, both are unique, and both must be stopped.

False Claim: Listen to the child when the reject a parent. They are not being controlled by their favored parent.
The truth: Children love both parents and should be able to remain neutral. They can be psychologically manipulated and controlled.

False Claim: Dr. Childress cites no evidence.
The truth: see his blog response. Also see the list of references for pathogenic parenting.

Complaint: “Attachment-based parental alienation does not address mild and moderate cases.”
Response: “So what. Let’s solve the severe cases, and then we can solve the mild and moderate cases.”  Further, on page 37 of Foundations, Dr. Childress specifically excludes “mild” and “moderate” because those can be solved by existing family therapy methods (e.g. not personality disorder involved).

Complaint: “The APA encourages clinicians to practice evidence based therapy”.
Response: each of the underlying pathologies in attachment-based parental alienation is standard psychology supported by evidence and research. All that is left is the responsibility of clinicians to render diagnosis, which they are obligated to do by their state licensing board (boundary of competence).

Complaint: Attachment-based parental alienation is psychoanalytic theory.
Response: each of the underlying pathologies is standard psychology based on evidence and research. For a purely empirical definition of the same phenomenon and proof that it is child abuse, refer to these six peer reviewed studies.  See also the empirical survey of 610 parents. See also the empirical study “parents behaving badly” which is also available in book form.  After empirical data is available, meaning is needed.  See also the essay entitled “the cult of empiricism“.

Complaint: There are no journal articles, so attachment-based parental alienation should be ignored.
Response: Per Dr. Childress Moving Forward Blog article, “this needed to be solved yesterday.  Because of that, I am working as hard as I can to speed the solution’s arrival as fast as I possibly can.  That’s why I’m not writing journal articles yet.  They take too long to write and get published, and they have only a minimal real-world impact.  My time right now is better spent in other areas.  That’s why I’m taking such an assertive stance with the Gardnerian PAS experts, because their withholding of support for the paradigm shift slows the achievement of the solution.


2 thoughts on “FAQ about Pathogenic Parenting

Leave a Reply, All comments will be moderated - Many thanks for your contribution

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.