FAQ about Pathogenic Parenting
The truth: “It has substantial empirical support in the established literature of professional psychology.” See the April 2016 Flying Monkey Newsletter. Pathogenic parenting is based on approximately 60 references to the standard literature of professional psychology.
The truth: “it is necessary for health psychological development of the child … Pathogenic Parenting is a child protection issue, not a custody issue”. The correct diagnosis is V995.51, Child Psychological Abuse. See the March 2016 issue of the Flying Monkey Newsletter
a. As Dr. Childress describes in his blog, “Peer review of journal articles is applicable to research studies, not diagnostic formulations. Diagnosis involves the application of standard and accepted psychological principles and constructs, that are already fully established through research, to a particular symptom set and pathology. An attachment-based model for the pathology traditionally called “parental alienation” (an attachment-related pathology), is not a new theory within mental health, it is the application of standard and established psychological constructs to the symptoms displayed by the child. This is called diagnosis. Furthermore, full clinical formulations regarding pathology are not submitted for peer-reviewed journal publication because clinical formulations of pathology are typically too extensive to be captured in a 10-page journal article. Kohut presented object-relations formulations of clinical pathology in a book. Minuchin presented family systems formulations of pathology in a book. Kernberg described personality disorder pathology in a book. Clinical theoretical formulations are presented in books, not journal articles, and books are not peer-reviewed. The “peer-review” of clinical formulations of pathology occurs when the book is read by mental health professionals. ”
b.) See also see Dr. Childress’ other blog article entitled “peer review” , where it is necessary to scroll down to the bottom. AB-PA is a diagnostic, conceptual, diagnostic formulation.
c.) In the blog article, The Gardnerian Challenge, Dr. Childress writes that he has done his job in laying out a formulation, and it is incumbent upon a critic to disagree with something or propose an alternate formulation. No one has provided an alternate formulation.
The Truth: Dr. Childress Points out that: In 100% of normal-range parenting by all parents everywhere in the country, when children present defiant and disrespectful behavior the parent imposes consequences – called discipline – designed to correct the child’s misbehavior. This isn’t called “coercion” – This is called “parenting.” Duh.
The truth: Yes, let’s listen to these children.
The truth: Child psychological abuse and DV both exist, both are bad, both are unique, and both must be stopped.
The truth: Children love both parents and should be able to remain neutral. They can be psychologically manipulated and controlled.
The truth: see his blog response. Also see the list of references for pathogenic parenting.
The truth: it is a child protection issue. Pathogenic parenting that is creating significant developmental pathology in the child, personality pathology in the child, and delusional psychiatric pathology in the child in order to meet the emotional and psychological needs of the parent represents a DSM – 5 diagnosis of V995.51 Child Psychological Abuse, Confirmed. It creates a Duty to Protect.
Response: “So what. Let’s solve the severe cases, and then we can solve the mild and moderate cases.” Further, on page 37 of Foundations, Dr. Childress specifically excludes “mild” and “moderate” because those can be solved by existing family therapy methods (e.g. not personality disorder involved).
Response: each of the underlying pathologies in attachment-based parental alienation is standard psychology supported by evidence and research. All that is left is the responsibility of clinicians to render diagnosis, which they are obligated to do by their state licensing board (boundary of competence).
Response: each of the underlying pathologies is standard psychology based on evidence and research. For a purely empirical definition of the same phenomenon and proof that it is child abuse, refer to these six peer reviewed studies. See also the empirical survey of 610 parents. See also the empirical study “parents behaving badly” which is also available in book form. After empirical data is available, meaning is needed. See also the essay entitled “the cult of empiricism“.
Response: Per Dr. Childress Moving Forward Blog article, “this needed to be solved yesterday. Because of that, I am working as hard as I can to speed the solution’s arrival as fast as I possibly can. That’s why I’m not writing journal articles yet. They take too long to write and get published, and they have only a minimal real-world impact. My time right now is better spent in other areas. That’s why I’m taking such an assertive stance with the Gardnerian PAS experts, because their withholding of support for the paradigm shift slows the achievement of the solution.