Posted in Parental Alienation & Narcissistic Personality Disorder

When Parental Alienation Crosses into the Criminal Jurisdiction

Background
I am writing this article as a follow up to an article I wrote that was published in The Law Society Gazette on 4th December 2018 and which focussed on a case in which I was involved and where I represented the father, Re D (a child (parental alienation) [2018] EWFC B64.

Crown court – relevance of parental alienation
Parental alienation is not confined to family cases.  It can and does feature in criminal cases, where allegations are made, by an alienating parent, against a backdrop of a prolonged, serious and acrimonious relationship between parents following separation/divorce.

When representing a parent in a criminal court I emphasise to my clients the need for all relevant facts to be before the jury, just as they need to be before a family court. This will require a thorough consideration of what might constitute relevant evidence coupled with a detailed request for disclosure from the prosecution.  This is so that the jury can properly understand and evaluate the family background which may have led to the allegations against the defendant.

Unfortunately and very often, I find myself representing a parent who did not think, at the outset, that  it was necessary to be represented at the police station and so attended without being accompanied by a solicitor.  As with any criminal case, the absence of legal representation at the police station can often cause a client considerable difficulty by the time it reaches trial.  This can arise for a number of reasons but most commonly in these types of cases because the parent is often in shock and distress when questioned by the police because allegations of this nature are deeply distressing and often historical.  The parent may then say something, innocently, that is either not accurate or subsequently contradictory of something else he or she may say.  This can often subsequently add weight to the prosecution’s case when seeking to suggest to the jury that the parent or his or her account is not credible.   Another risk of the client attending the police station alone is that police procedures and conduct may not be properly applied and, as such, the client is prejudiced.   Without knowing the rules and procedures, the client will not know when or how to complain.

Cross-examining children and young people, whether in the family court or the criminal court, is never easy.  They are vulnerable and at all times require sensitivity and need systems in place [known as “special measures”] which facilitates them giving evidence.  However, with skilled and experienced cross-examination, any unreliability in their evidence can usually be unravelled.

https://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed200967

Advertisements

Author:

Currently studying Psychotherapy , Cognitive psychology, Biological psychology, Counselling psychology and CBT. I believe in truth, honesty and integrity! ≧◔◡◔≦

Leave a Reply, All comments will be moderated - Many thanks for your contribution

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.